scope of this course. However, three common factors to consider are: - Compensating for different levels of risks between projects.
- Recognizing risks that are specific to foreign projects.
- Making adjustments to capital budgeting analysis by looking at
actual results.
Adjusting for Risk
We previously learned that we can manage uncertainty by initiating decision analysis and building options into our projects. We now want to turn our attention to managing risks. It is worth noting that uncertainty and risk are not
same thing. Uncertainty is where you have no basis for a decision. Risk is where you do have a basis for a decision, but you have
wider
higher In our previous example (Example 6), we used
replacement of equipment and carried a low level of risk since
answer is no since this project could have a much wider variation in outcomes. We can adjust for higher levels of risk by increasing
discount rate. A higher discount rate reflects a higher rate of return that we require whenever we have higher levels of risk.Another way to adjust for risk is to understand
impact of risk on outcomes. Sensitivity Analysis and Simulation can be used to measure how changes to a project affect
change in Net Present Value given a change in a specific variable, such as estimated project revenues. Simulation allows us to simulate
project. It should be noted that sensitivity analysis is much easier to implement since sophisticated computer models are usually required for simulation. International Projects
Capital investments in other countries can involve additional risks. Whenever we invest in a foreign project, we want to focus on
values that are added (or subtracted) to
project, such as exchange rate risk, political risk, hyper-inflation, etc. For example,
foreign subsidiary converted to
current exchange rate. This forces us to take into account exchange rate risks and its impact to
Parent Company. Post Analysis
One of
most important steps in capital budgeting analysis is to follow-up and compare your estimates to actual results. This post analysis or review can help identify bias and errors within
overall process. A formal tracking system of capital projects also keeps everyone honest. For example, if you were to announce to everyone that actual results will be tracked during
life of
purpose of post analysis and tracking is to collect information that will lead to improvements within
capital budgeting process. Course Summary
long-term investments we make today determines
value we will have tomorrow. Therefore, capital budgeting analysis is critical to creating value within financial management. And
only certainty within capital budgeting is uncertainty. Therefore, one of
biggest challenges in capital budgeting is to manage uncertainty. We deal with uncertainty through a three-stage process:1. Build knowledge through decision analysis.
2. Recognize and encourage options within projects.
3. Invest based on economic criteria that have realistic economic assumptions.
Once we have completed
three-stage process (as outlined above), we evaluate capital projects using a mix of economic criteria that adheres to
principles of financial management. Three good economic criteria are Net Present Value, Modified Internal Rate of Return, and Discounted Payback.Additionally, we need to manage project risk differently than we would manage uncertainty. We have several tools to help us manage risks, such as increasing
discount rate. Finally, we want to implement post analysis and tracking of projects after we have made
investment. This helps eliminate bias and errors in
capital budgeting process.
No comments:
Post a Comment